June 17, 2006
-
Can Believers doubt their salvation?
Mick O’Brien and myself had the opportunity to discuss this important subject.The discussion goes for less than 25 minutes and is under 3MB. I am interested to know what you think! Are Mick and I wrong?
http://Godnoliar.com/Can_Believers_Doubt_Discussion.mp3
Issues discussed were:
- Is it possible to believe the gospel, and not know you are a believer?
- Why do most Calvinists doubt their salvation at times? Is it because they are basing their confidence on their own works?

Comments (35)
Isn’t the question rather: “According to your theology, is it possible for a believer to doubt their salvation?”
your theology….is HORRIBLE!!!
why’d you hang up on me before i said bye??!
Hey, I’m just wondering if you have any response to the fact that John the Baptist doubted pretty much everything he knew about Christ?
oops i should have posted this here…
I basicly agree with Bain that we really shouldn’t doubt. I don’t doubt, period. I think many people doubt because they look for “marks of regeneration” that are mistaken. They are looking at their works not because they are trying to gain salvation by works, or to trust in works, but they are confusing regeneration with their works. They miss the fact that regeneration does not guarantee them victory over all sin. It does guarantee you will struggle with sin, however. Everyone knows that the man that says he believes and refuses to do anything at all about their sin does not truly believe, for if they truly believed, that belief would cause them to fight against sin… not just sit there and wallow in it and enjoy it. So for a person to be warranted in doubting, they would have to be living like an unbeliever, and if they are living like an unbeliever, they still need to be saved. Yet since many doubters doubt because of this messed up idea, I would have to be placed in the camp of tolerant, because to me it looks like they are mistaken and not trying to trust in works. To this I’m sure Bain will call me twice a child of hell or something… since I’m so close yet fall short of his little camp. By the way I listened to your .mpg discusion and I find it sick how you laugh at people you think are perishing… if that is really true, it definately ISN’T funny, it would be very, very sad indeed, and cause you to fall flat on your face before God, praying that he may have mercy on legions of unsaved ‘pretended christians’. To me it seems glib, sonsorious, and without any compassion. I don’t know your heart but that’s how it comes across to me, and the demeanor seems ugly and a turn-off. If you enjoy coming across that way, fine but it won’t convince anyone.
HI! Interesting and nifty blog you’ve got here…
I’ve wondered that same question, too. I’ve never come up with an awser. Personaly for myself, I believe I stopped doubting my salvation completely around the time that I believe I was saved…but is that true for everyone?
When you said, “To think, “I believe the gospel, but I am not sure I am saved” is to imply that someone can believe the gospel and not be saved. It’s just as heretical as thinking, ‘God lied when he said all believers are saved.’” I very much believe that people can believe the Gospel and not be saved. How else would you explain all the people in the workd who profess to believing the Bible and yet are not Christians?? I asked my ex-pastor (that sounds so aweful…”ex” because we moved)how people can believe in Jesus and not be saved. He said that there is a difference between saving faith and, well, just faith, I guess (that’s probably not the best way to phrase it…). I mean, before I was actualy saved I believed the Bible 100%. I have never doubted it in my life.
Oh, and I like the first half of what the last girl said. I agreed with that. I didn’t watch your thingie, though, because I have really slow internet, so I have no opinion whatsoever.
Here’s an interesting question for you (basically, I’m gauging my opinion of your beliefs here….) do you believe people other than Reformers can/are be saved? I knew somebody once who believed that only Calvinists are saved…I totally don’t agree with that.
Excuse me, I just called him a girl…. lol
Sorry about that.
True belief causes true repentance perhaps? I would think the people that claim to believe and are unsaved never truly believed…
How about working out your salvation with fear and trembling? Phillipians 2:12. Quoting that to say that salvation may be more of a mystery than we think. Doubt, in my experience, has less to do with actual salvation and more to do with a persons emotional reaction to certain situations. ie: “I made out with my girl too much and feel bad, oh no, am I saved?”
Remember that election and salvation are different things. There is a process in salvation. The elect aren’t immune to questions. Rather, they may be the only people who ask them. Would a person not of the elect ever think of God and wonder why he wasn’t part of the elect? of course not. It would never occur to them.
Grace and Peace
Paul didn’t question his salvation in Romans 7, Why do you have to ask yourself if you’re saved in order to repent? I believe it’s practicly harmful to be under the weight of such a seesaw. It’s better to go forward with assurance and grattitude, and hate the sin and deal with it ruthlessly. We have to be careful when refering to salvation as a process… actually I believe that sanctification is a process rather, salvation is only a process in that scripture speaks of the salvation of our physical bodies when the dead are raised uncorruptable.
*incorruptable* lol
Oh and about working out your salvation with fear and trembling, is refering to the respect we have for God, and a healthy fear of chastisements in this life. It is not as though God threatens to send us to hell when we sin badly. But he does chastise us, and sometimes severly, in this life. Working out our salvation does not mean adding to it in any way, or preserving it by our own actions… it has to do with living out our daily lives as saved people. If it was OUR doing, the verse surely would not go on to say, :for it is GOD that works within you, to will and act according to HIS good purpose.”
hey, I noticed you’re subscribed to me. May I ask why?
Salvation is a process:
http://www.scripturecatholic.com/salvation.html
Salvation is not a process:
http://www.scionofzion.com/process.htm
I didn’t say that salvation is a process, I said there is a process in salvation. I agree with you, sanctification is a process, not salvation. There is a jump from Election to Salvation that must happen. That is what I was talking about.
The heart of my stance is that questioning your salvation has nothing to do with piety and everything to do with the emotions that humans have. Thats what I was saying. What do you think of that?
I noticed you subscribed to my site… do you by any chance know my family or my dad in particular? He has done preaching ministries in Australia.
hello.. I think u msged me on AIM.. well i wanted to let u know i wasnt being rude or anything.. the computer freaked out. anyways anytime u wanna talk if im on IM me.
The Heidelberg Catechism of 1563 is generally understood by most reformed theologians to teaach that assuarnce is of the essence of saving faith. Question 21 reads:
Q. What is true faith?
A. True faith is not only a certain knowledge whereby I hold for tru all that God has revealed to is in his Word (1), but also a hearty trust (2) which the Holy Ghost (3) works in me by the Gospel (4), that not only to others, but to me also, forgiveness of sins, everlasting righteousness and salvation are freely given by God (5), merely of grace, only for the sake of Christ’s merits (6).
(1) James 1:6
(2) Rom. 4:16-18; Rom. 5:1
(3) 2Cor. 14:13; Phil. 1:19, 29
(4) Rom. 1:16; 10:17
(5) Heb. 11:1-2; Rom. 1:17
(6)Eph. 2:7-9; Rom. 3:24-25; Gal. 2:16
__________________________
The Westminster Confession is generally understood to not make assurance off the essence of saving faith.
WCF Chapter 18: sec. 3
“III. This infallible assurance does not so belong to the essence of faith, but that a true believer may wait long, and conflict with many difficulties, before he be partaker of it: yet, being enabled by the Spirit to know the things which are freely given him of God, he may, without extraordinary revelation in the right use of ordinary means, attain thereunto. And therefore it is the duty of every one to give all diligence to make his calling and election sure, that thereby his heart may be enlarged in peace and joy in the Holy Ghost, in love and thankfulness to God, and in strength and cheerfulness in the duties of obedience, the proper fruits of this assurance; so far is it from inclining men to looseness.
_________________________
Good chatting with you today.
“but that a true believer may wait long, and conflict with many difficulties, before he be partaker of it:”
That’s one reason I don’t agree with everything in the WCF. It makes it sound like everybody should be doubting out there, and only the aged select few should have assurance.
God promises that all believers are saved – fully and completely. That’s attested to all over scripture, including many of the passages that you mentioned.
However God does not reveal in his word specificly if YOU are a believer. So I find that doubt lies more around the question “Am I *REALLY* a beliver?” rather than “Am I really saved?”
That’s why there are no examples of a believer questioning their salvation. With a bit of inference I think there are people who question their salvation because they question their status as a true disciple of Christ. Perhaps Nicodemus, or the rich young ruler who went away saddened, maybe even Peter during his thrice denial yet before he became a believer at the Resurection.
“Wherefor let him that thinketh he standeth take heed – lest he fall” ~ 1 Cor 10:12
“Not everyone that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not phrophesied in they name? and in they name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity” ~ Matt 7:21-23
Those people didn’t doubt their salvation. They doubted Jesus instead. They thought they were believers and were clear that “believer = salvation”. But the problem was they weren’t too clear about thier true status as a believer. The bible seems to form a clear category for people that look like belivers – but aren’t truely believers.
What about Judas? Should he have questioned his salvation, even though he’d followed Christ for three years? What about the parable of the four soil types? The seed of true faith and the seed that sprung up soon, but eventually was scorchedby (the persecution of) the son?
I think it’s good to question your status as a believer.
But as a believer it’s wrong to question the status of your salvation.
Don’t forget to donate to Michael Plaza’s Comment Jar . We’re taking up a collection for him to relish when he comes back from California (and thereafter takes control of his blog again).
If you are questioning your status as a believer, what are you doing that would make you want to do that? Sure if you live like a pagan, then the belief you have is not the scriptural kind, that has such a quality to it that it turns you away from your sins, as Paul discusses in Rom. 7. So if someone is always questioning, then they must be living like an unbeliever… no?
Doubting Calvinist writes: “Although assurance is an important part of saving faith, children of God can struggle with doubts because of sin. It is possible that someone is convinced that all gospel doctrines are true, but does not trust in Christ for his own particular salvation. Furthermore, saving faith is more than merely to thinking that a set of doctrines is true. Your position is very dangerous.”
_________________________________
Why did you laber this person a Doubting Calvinist? He expressed no doubt: He allowed for the possibility of it within the household of faith. The condescending title you gave him is childish. The arrogant tone and ignorant opinions you express in your refusal to accept the truth of what he said sound exactly like a concieted Calvinist teenager who needs to read up on the issue further before becoming more emotionally attached to his pet erroneous opinion. I would know; I was one not long ago. I have since rejected the position you are arguing for so vehemently.
Ok, first and foremost, Calvinists believe the complete OPPOSITE of a works based salvation. We believe (and Paul says many times) that we had nothing to do with our salvation, that we were dead in our sins, and if we DID have anything to do with our savaltion, we’d have grounds on which to boast (which he also says that we don’t)… Yes it is possible for believe the gospel and not be saved because even the demons believe that God exists, and believing that God exists and believing the gospel is so near to the same thing, the difference hardly matters. I think we went over everything else, so I’ll shut up now, lol. Thanks for chatting!
God bless, ~Rae
“Doubting Calvinist writes: “Although assurance is an important part of saving faith, children of God can struggle with doubts because of sin.”
My point is we are expected to struggle with sin in Rom. 7. So now why are you doubting? Do you not struggle with your sin? People that just wallow in it do not have true belief so well if you wallow in it, doubt away, you still need to believe whole heartedly the gospel, and not be double minded. (“You” is in the theoretical, not personal relm here
So, how about that charity? lol
It was nice chatting. I’m still interested in discussing this topic with you sometime. May God bless. Seek the wisdom of our Lord remembering that “knowledge of the Holy One is insight.” (Proverbs 9:10)
Hey,
Good questions. I didn’t get to listen to the file, but I thought I’d throw in something about that last topic discussed. I’ve always thought that Armenians would have more cause to doubt because of works. Personally I would have more assurance of Salvation if I could base my assurance on works as much as Armenians can.
As a believer in the doctrine of Grace, if I was doubting my Salvation, I would have doubts and apprehensions because of the fact I cannot base my assurance on any type of work. My election and Salvation is in the hands of God. I could see how a Calvinist could come to the point where they wonder if they’re possibly not elect and therefore just decieving themselves as to their Salvation.
I don’t know…it’s an interesting question to think about. I’m probably not making any sense here. Anyway, God bless!
===Joe says, “I cannot agree with you when you say that he who doubts his salvation is lost. Granted that the one who doubts makes God a liar. This is a sin, and a serious sin”===
Me: So we AGREE that if a believer could doubt their salvation, they would be calling God a liar. Now 1 John 5:10 says “the one not believing God” calls Him a liar. Thus, those who call God a liar are “not believing God”. In other words, those who doubt their salvation, and call God a liar, are NOT believers!
1) Doubting your salvation is calling God a liar
2) Those who call God a liar are not believing God, i.e. not believers
3) Therefore believers cannot call God a liar, i.e. doubt their salvation
===Joe says: “The fact that such doubting thoughts enter one’s mind does not prove that the doubter is not saved; only that he is still a sinner. As Spurgeon said, “God will accept a faith which is mingled with doubts, and even a trembling hand can receive a golden gift.”===
Me: Even the faith of the mustard seed can move mountains (is without doubt) !!
Also, James 1:6-7 says that those who “pray” wavering can expect nothing
from God. Now, someone doubting their salvation is wavering.
Therefore, they can expect nothing from God.
“But if any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask from God, who gives to
all freely and with no reproach, and it will be given to him. But let
him ask in faith, doubting nothing. For the one who doubts is like a
wave of the sea, being driven by wind and being tossed; for do not let
that man suppose that he will receive anything from the Lord; he is a
double-minded man, not dependable in all his ways.” (Jam 1:5-8)
2 Corinthians 13:5 says that people who are not sure whether or not
Christ is in them are unregenerate. Someone doubting their salvation
obviously cannot perceive Christ in them.
“Or do you not yourselves perceive that Jesus Christ is in you, unless
you are disapproved?” (2 Cor 13:5)
Paul addressed his letter to the Ephesians with “to the saints and
faithful at Ephesus”. Paul assumed that the Ephesians knew they were
saints and faithful (otherwise, they would not have known the epistle
was for them). Someone doubting their salvation do not have the
assurance of salvation of the Ephesians .
“Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God, to the
saints being in Ephesus and faithful in Christ Jesus.” (Eph 1:1)
===Joe says: He will even accept a faith which is so weak it can only cry out, “Lord I believe; help, Thou, my unbelief.” ===
Me: It’s crucial to look at WHEN the centurion said “help my unbelief”. This was BEFORE the Resurrection. And before the Resurrection, NOBODY — including John the Baptist and Thomas — could be certain that Jesus was the Christ. They all had doubts and uncertainties about his messiahship. Nobody could be certain that Jesus was the Christ until the Resurrection. Why? Because Christ said the Resurrection was the ONE SIGN He would give to prove His Sonship. So the only way the centurions unbelief could be curied was by the Resurrection, which would have proved to Him that Jesus was the Christ. Indeed as Peter says in Acts, the Resurrection was God’s declaration to all men that Jesus is the Christ.
Therefore, BEFORE the Resurrection NOBODY could be sure that Jesus was the Christ. However, after the Resurrection and Pentecost, the Holy Spirit declared Jesus to be the Christ. Therefore, anyone today who denies Jesus’ messiahship is blaspheming the Holy Spirit. Unless they repent (have a change of mind) they will likewise perish.
===Joe says: Although Paul’s faith was doubtless strong as strong can be, we are not all apostle Pauls.===
See 2 Peter 1:1. All believers have EQUALLY PRECIOUS FAITH with the Apostles. Now, if the Apostles had full assurance, in order for your faith to be “equally precious”, you would have to have full assurance too. For example, if the Apostle Paul has assurance but you don’t, then you’re faith is not equally precious to Paul’s.
1) Believers have equally precious faith with the Apostles
2) The Apostles never doubted their salvaiton
3) Therefore, believers cannot doubt either since their faith is equally precious
Hope that helps!
Oh hope you don’t mind me pasting an article on the Psalms too!
WHAT ABOUT THE PSALMS? Didn’t David doubt his salvation in the Psalms?
All sects — from Roman Catholics to Presbyterians — assume that the
Psalms are David’s/Heman’s/Asaph’s private experiences.
But where does the Scripture say this??
Nowhere.
The Apostles never say that the Psalms describe David’s private
experiences. In fact, the Apostles apply and identify about 1/3 of the
Psalms as speaking of Christ. The other 2/3rds are essentially the
same in content, and must also be Messianic.
Yet, every Sunday “Pastors” around the world PRIVATELY interpret the
Psalms . By “private interpretation” I mean the practice of taking
passages from the Psalms and interpreting them as ya-feel-like-it.
For instance, it is often assumed that Psalm 69 is descriptive of
David’s own experience. People think that these verses describe David
doubting his salvation….
Psalm 69:17,20,21: “And do not hide Your face from Your servant; for
it is distressing to Me; answer Me quickly. draw near My soul; redeem
it; ransom Me because of My enemies. Reproach has broken My heart, and
I am faint; and I waited for one to show pity, but there was none; and
for comforters, but I found none. They also gave Me gall in My food;
and in My thirst they gave Me vinegar to drink.”
Now, there’s a problem with saying this is David’s own experience. A
big problem.
It’s actually Christ speaking in this Psalm! Not David. In John 19:29,
the Holy Spirit records the fact that Christ was offered vinegar to
drink.
“Then a vessel full of vinegar was set, and having filled a sponge
with vinegar, and putting hyssop around, they brought it to His
mouth.”
The Apostles never say that the Psalms are descriptive of David’s
private experiences. They limit David to the role of a mere secretary
and prophet concerning Christ. “David being a prophet says…”, “David
in the Spirit says…”, “God says in David…”, “Christ says in
David…”, “The Holy Spirit spoke by the mouth of David…”.
I challenge you to show me one — just one! — time in the New
Testament when the Psalms are interpreted as being David’s private
experiences.
The Bible NOWHERE says that the Psalms refer to the experience of
David, Asaph, Heman etc. The Apostles say, “David being a prophet
says,” “David in Spirit says,” “God says in David,” “Christ says in
David,” “The Holy Spirit says by the mouth of David.” etc. But the
Apostles NEVER say that the Psalms refer to David’s experience. David
was merely a prophet/mouthpiece/secretary for God.
Over and over again the Psalms are applied to CHRIST in the New
Testament. Let’s take a look at Psalm 6. Heaps of “preachers” would
use this Psalm to “prove” that a believer can doubt their salvation.
For instance, the words of Psalm 6:1 are ” O Jehovah, do not rebuke me
in Your anger; nor chasten me in the heat of Your fury.” If this was
the experience of David, this would definitely prove that David lost
assurance of his justification. But this is NOT David’s experience.
It’s Christ on the cross. This Psalm is applied to Christ in Luke
13:27. “And He will say, I tell you I do not know you, from where you
are. “Stand back from Me all workers of unrighteousness!” Psa. 6:8″ –
Because the whole of Psalm 6 is in one voice, if Christ is speaking in
verse 8, he must be speaking in verse 1, too.
In fact, ALL those passages in the Psalms which people try to use to
prove that believers can doubt their salvation are referring to Christ
on the cross. Read Hebrews 5:7. Christ “in the days of His flesh was
offering both petitions and entreaties to Him being able to save Him
from death, with strong crying and tears, and being heard from His
godly fear.” Crying? Tears? Petitions? This was Christ being made a
curse on the cross for the Elect. He cried, “My God, My God, why have
you forsaken me?” because he WAS made a curse. But believers are NEVER
forsaken, because He was forsaken in their place on Calvary.
The Psalms are prophetic. We can only know their meaning by the
infallible interpretations of the Apostles and Christ. And guess what?
They speak only about Christ. Peter says, the prophets were “
testifying beforehand of the sufferings belonging to CHRIST,” (1 Peter
1:12).
Indeed, “the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy” (Rev
19:10). The Psalms are not the testimony of David!!
I challenge you NOT to be a Jew. Stop reading the Psalms like the Jews.
Maybe you apply more Psalms to Christ than they do. But essentially,
you both say the Psalms are David’s. Something the Apostles never say.
For centuries Jews have read the Psalms. But almost all of them have
died seeing only David in the Psalms. It’s sad isn’t it? As with all
prophecy, the meaning of the passages MUST BE REVEALED. You can’t just
open a passage of the Psalms and go, “oh that’s talking about David.”
Anymore, than you can open up Isaiah 53 (the chapter about the
Suffering Servant) and say, “oh that’s talking about the nation
Israel”. Prophecy — by the Apostle Peter’s definition — cannot be
privately interpreted. “No prophecy is of any private interpretation.”
We can learn something from Christ’s parables in the New Testament.
The disciples simply couldn’t work out what Christ was on about in his
parables. They were flabbergasted. “And His disciples came to Him,
saying, Explain to us the parable of the darnel of the field.” (Mt
13:36). The Lord had to sit ‘em down and explain the EXACT meaning of
the parable of darnel of the field. It’s the same with prophecy.
You’ve got to sit down with the Apostles and they’ll tell you the
meaning. Otherwise, you’ll be in the dark just like the disciples were
before Christ interpreted the prophecy.
Sadly, most Presbyterians and Reformed Baptists privately interprete
the Psalms. By that, I mean they interprete the Psalms according to
their own fancies. This is incredible. Are they wiser than God? I’m
not kidding. This is a question all you doubting Calvinists out there
should consider. God says over and over again that the Psalms are
about Christ. And He also says David was merely “a prophet” and that
“the Holy Spirit spoke before THROUGH DAVID’S MOUTH” (Acts 1:15) and
that “David himself said BY THE HOLY SPIRIT” (Mk 12:36). Yet, you
doubting Calvinists think your interpretation of the Psalms is better
than God’s. You apply them to David. Something God never does, and he
continually warns us that it was the “Holy spirit speaking by the
mouth of David.”
David was merely God’s secretary. As Peter says, “…the patriarch
David … BEING A PROPHET, … spoke about the resurrection of the
Christ.” (Acts 2:29-31). And what do prophets write about? Do they
write about their own personal experiences? No. Peter says, the
prophets were “testifying beforehand of the sufferings belonging to
Christ” (1 Pet 1:11).
Paul says, — “eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor has it entered the
heart of man.” Indeed, God revealed the meaning of prophecy only to
the Apostles, “But God revealed them TO US by His Spirit” (1 Cor
2:10).
Two facts need to be understood:
1) David was a prophet.
and
2) Prophets do not write about their own experiences.
Christians listen to the Apostles! Only they know the meaning of
prophecy! They alone can reveal to you the meaning of the Psalms!
These Divine Ambassadors say, “We are of God; the one knowing God
hears us. Whoever is not of God does not hear us. FROM THIS WE KNOW
THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH AND THE SPIRIT OF ERROR.”
Don’t be like the authors of the Westminster Confession, who twisted
many of the Psalms. Boy, they tried desperately to find a Biblical
example of a believer doubting their salvation.
For example, see Chapter 18 Part III of the Confession. Here the
“Divines” wrote that, “… infallible assurance does not so belong to
the essence of faith, but that a true believer may wait long, and
conflict with many difficulties, before he be partaker of it.”
If you check the footnote on this page of the Confession you’ll see
that as “proof texts” Psalm 88 and 77 are used. In other words, the
Westminster “Divines” thought that in Psalm 88 Heman is doubting his
salvation and in Psalm 77 Asaph is doubting his salvation. They
thought this proved believers could doubt their salvation.
But weren’t Heman and Asaph prophets? And do prophets speak of their
own experiences? Peter says, the prophets were “testifying beforehand
of the sufferings belonging to CHRIST,” (1 Peter 1:12). Hmmm….
In fact, Psalm 88 contains the lament: “why do You hide Your face from
me?”. This lament is commonly used by Christ throughout the Psalms.
Psalm 69, for example, contains this lament. And the New Testament
says that Psalm 69 is about Christ. Paul in Romans 15:3 applies Psalm
69 to Christ. And Christ applies this Psalm to himself in John 2:17,
John 15:25, John 19:29 etc etc.
So, you should realise that Christ himself claimed the prophecy was
speaking about Himself. But you say the Psalms are about David. You
are not better than a blaspheming Jew, Whit! Maybe you apply less of
the Psalms to David than they do. But, at the end of the day, you are
not looking at what the Apostles have to say. You are privately
interpreting the Psalms according to your own fancies. But Peter said
that, “NO PROPHECY OF SCRIPTURE IS OF ANY PRIVATE INTERPRETATION.”
Look to the New Testament, and find that the Psalms speak of Christ,
and the Church. Not David, who was a prophet.
Hey… and remember that there is NOT a single New Testament passage
saying the Psalms are about David.
OBJECTION: WHAT ABOUT PSALM 51
God says that Psalm 51 is about Christ. Read Hebrews 10:5-6.
“5 For this reason, coming into the world, He [Jesus Christ] says,
“Sacrifice and offering You did not desire, but You prepared a body
for Me. 6 You did not delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices
concerning sins.
“Here we see that it is JESUS CHRIST who says: “YOU DO NOT DELIGHT IN
BURNT OFFERINGS”.
These are the words of the God-man Jesus Christ. Will you steal the
words of His mouth and give them to David?
Because in Psalm 51 these EXACT words are found!! Read verse 16. “For
you do not desire sacrifice, or I would give it; You do not delight in
burnt offering.”
Clearly, it is Christ who says “YOU DO NOT DELIGHT IN BURNT OFFERING”.
Psalm 51 are the words of Jesus Christ to His Father. It is was Christ
“says”, according to Hebrews 10:6.
Regarding this Psalm, Jeremy wrote me, === “I was brought forth in
iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me. (Psalm 51:1-5) …. Do
enlighten me as to how this applies to our Savior who “in every
respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin”===
In response: Jeremy, do you really believe the sins of the elect were
imputed to Christ on the cross? The New Testament says, “HE WAS MADE A
CURSE” and “He who knew no sin WAS MADE SIN FOR US”. Yes, Christ was a
lamb without blemish. He was perfect. He never sinned. He was never
stained within.
But when the sins of the elect were imputed, Christ TOOK THE DEBT upon
himself. Let me explain. Suppose you owe your parents $50. Kindly, a
friend of yours takes the debt from you, so that your friend is now in
debt to your parents for $50. Of course, your friend never accumulated
the debt himself.
In the same way, Christ never sinned. But He did take the debt/sins of
the elect to be his own. In other words, He “owned” their sins, so to
speak, whilst on the cross. Thus, he can refer to them as “my
iniquities” because the sins were in His account.
A FINAL CHALLENGE
I challenge you NOT to be a Jew. Stop reading the Psalms like the
Jews. Maybe you apply more Psalms to Christ than they do. But
essentially, you both say the Psalms are David’s. Something the
Apostles never say.
Here’s some objections from a few doubting Calvinists I had to answer.
Jeremy writes, “I also do not think that all of the Psalms are about Jesus.”
My response: How do you know this? Where does the New Testament say
any of the Psalms are about David’s own experience? Let’s assume for a
moment that some of the Psalms are actually David’s experiences. How
would we know which ones they are? It’s not obvious. Could you ever
say you are *certain* about which Psalms are David’s experiences?
Anyways, you’re simply not using the New Testament at all. You might
as well be living 2100 years ago, before we had the Apostles. After
all, you think they’re useless.
You won’t listen to a thing the Apostles have to say about the Psalms.
I mean, aren’t you *privately* interpreting the Psalms? Aren’t you
trying to make yourself into an Apostle? Isn’t it the Apostle’s job
alone, to interprete prophecy?
Next up….
Travis writes,
“Unless … the spirit of God possessed someone in a zombie-like
fashion to hammer out the psalms with no other factors, that seems
like the only way your theory holds up. “
My response: Yes, David was merely a secretary. That’s what the
Apostle Peter says in Acts 1:15. “the Holy Spirit spoke before THROUGH
DAVID’S MOUTH”. Also, God spoke “THROUGH THE MOUTH of Your servant
David” (Acts 4:25), God was “saying in David” (Heb 4:7), “David IN
SPIRIT [calls]” (Mt 22:43), “David himself said BY THE HOLY SPIRIT”
(Mk 13:36).
I wouldn’t call David a “zombie”. But he was merely a mouth-piece of God.
Christie asks, “What about Psalm 51?”
G’day Christie!
I’m going to paste two verses of Scripture. And you’re going to notice
something interesting…
Hebrews 10:5-6, “coming into the world, He [Jesus Christ] says,
“Sacrifice and offering You did not desire, but You prepared a body
for Me. You did not delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices
concerning sins.”
Psalm 51:16 “For you do not desire sacrifice, or I would give it; You
do not delight in burnt offering.”
That strange!! These verses are almost exactly the same! It this a
coincidence?? Why, of course not. The author to the Hebrews is making
something very clear — Psalm 51 is about Christ.
For a quick illustration — If someone 2000 years ago had asked the
author to the Hebrews, “Mr Apostle. Who was the famous person who
said, ” You did not delight in burnt offerings.”??” The author to the
Hebrews would have answered, “Jesus Christ…. Those are His Words”.
And since these words are found in Psalm 51, then Psalm 51 is about
Christ. Christ says, “You did not delight in burnt offering”. The
Psalmist says, “You do not delight in burnt offering.” Therefore,
Christ is the Psalmist!! By that I mean, Christ was speaking through
the mouth of David.
David was merely a secretary. That’s what the Apostle Peter says in
Acts 1:15. “the Holy Spirit spoke before THROUGH DAVID’S MOUTH”. Also,
God spoke “THROUGH THE MOUTH of Your servant David” (Acts 4:25), God
was “saying in David” (Heb 4:7), “David IN SPIRIT [calls]” (Mt 22:43),
“David himself said BY THE HOLY SPIRIT” (Mk 13:36).
OBJECTION: Was Christ a sinner?
Now, here’s comes the tricky bit. What about Psalm 51:3?? It says,
“For I know my transgressions; and my sin is ever before me.
Could Christ say, “I know MY transgressions”?? Maybe He’s not talking
about sin He himself committed but IMPUTED sin (the sins of His
people).
Hmmmm … Do you really believe the sins of the elect were imputed to
Christ on the cross? The New Testament says, “HE WAS MADE A CURSE” and
“He who knew no sin WAS MADE SIN FOR US”. Yes, Christ was a lamb
without blemish. He was perfect. He never sinned. He was never stained
within.
But when the sins of the elect were imputed, Christ TOOK THE DEBT upon
himself. Let me explain. Suppose you owe your parents $50. Kindly, a
friend of yours takes the debt from you, so that your friend is now in
debt to your parents for $50. Of course, your friend never accumulated
the debt himself.
In the same way, Christ never sinned. But He did take the debt/sins of
the elect to be his own. In other words, He “owned” their sins, so to
speak, whilst on the cross. Thus, he can refer to them as “my
iniquities” because the sins were in His account.
Andrew Bain
Sydney, Australia
I haven’t listened to your whole discussion, however I do have a short comment about the last two questions you asked. I think you’re on to something here. I think that there is a tendency within Calvinistic communities to put a lot of emphasis on works (which is ironic because they will ALWAYS tell you they do not believe in salvation by works). But when you hold a position (as most Calvinists do) that good works are a means of assurance for the believer, I think it becomes very easy to flip to the reverse idea that if you don’t see certain works in your life or if you keep sinning over and over again, that perhaps you are not truly a Christian. Of course, this reasoning is faulty, because first and foremost, we must understand that our assurance rests upon the promises of God (accomplished in the vicarious atonement of Christ), not on our level of sanctification (which is itself, God’s work and not ours!). AND I think it is this emphasis on good works that has allowed SO MANY “Reformed” believers to fall into the New Perspective on Paul trap. If you hold to the former position that our works assure us of our salvation, it only makes sense that salvation would be by an obedient faith rather than faith ALONE. It’s a blurring of justification and sanctification.
This is a very timely discussion, and the more I think about it, the more I can see how key this idea of assurance is. I think put very simply, those who doubt their own salvation are not resting in the promises of Christ; they’re resting in their own understanding.
Great subject matter, in light of the fact a true Calvinist will realize that his faith or his ability to have faith is via imputation and is an external act, realized at a specific point in the constrictions of time and space~contrictions our Creator, our Redeemer and His Spirit from which He proceeds are not restricted to, but work within.
Since even faith is not a work, yet it can be readily confused to be a work because one must believe and have faith (trust). It is very easy to get caught up in conviction, because of our other imputed nature which we were born with and struggle with until that final day on this earth, is at war with God and hates him. Our trust in His righteousness does grow over time as we glean understanding of just what it was that He did for us. It is most likely what is meant in working out our own salvation.
If we had totally shed our old nature, then doubted, I could see it being problematic. I can only have total faith in Christ when I abandon all faith in myself and my works. We all have spiritual warfare, internally-in fact if we didn’t I am not sure we would be Alive In Christ!
Oh sure. And doubting one’s salvation is clearly described in the Bible as the One Unforgiveable Sin, which God can’t cleanse us of. Of course, He’d like to. But they took a vote, but the Arminians and free-willers and their cohorts took the majority and decided to make sure the Calvinists got REALLY screwed by categorizing anything resembling salvation-doubting as Unforgiveable.
And that was NOT sarcasm.
But that was.
I’m not sure why this is such an issue. (Is it?) God’s grace is abundant and boundless; and He is ever swift to shelter the timid and bruised, the frightened, doubting and weary. O ye of little faith? Ring a bell? A smouldering wick he will not snuff out and a bruised reed he will not break. The Apostles themselves were not ever-constant. After the death of Christ, they went back to fishing (“well, that was fun”). Even when Christ appeared to them after His Resurrection, Thomas doubted for a time.
The issue, then, is not whether our salvation depends on ourselves, our own doubts and fears and sins, but whether, once saved, we instantly, perfectly, and consistently live out our faith in our thoughts and actions. Thus, it is an question of the process of sanctification. Care to start a new post?
I am interested in reading more. May God Bless you and Keep you.
I believe, and I doubt.
I have no doubt of my own salvation at the present time, but I have stronger assurance than you, Bain, because the possibility of doubt in the future doesn’t threaten my assurance now. You are stuck depending on your own lack of doubt. I pity you.
By the way, your theology and logic are atrocious.
Look at this sorry example of your attempt at deductive reasoning-
“1) Doubting your salvation is calling God a liar
2) Those who call God a liar are not believing God, i.e. not believers
3) Therefore believers cannot call God a liar, i.e. doubt their salvation” (Andrew Bain)
Since the glaring inadequancy of this will be apparent to all who read it, I see no need to highlight it for you.
For me the clincher was Romans 8:15-16. I was Unconverted, but still within the Church, and knew theology, Church History, and vast portions of Scripture by heart, but still was going to Hell. When I stated that as fact, people would point to what I could produce as knowledge and say “You know so much, surely you’re saved”. Romans 8:15-16 became the basis for the Holy Spirit’s work in my life:
His Spirit Bears witness with our spirit that we ARE the Children of God.
That verse preached an assurance that I knew I lacked. Humorously, 2 months after realizing this, that same verse became the conviction of my salvation, once Father had moved upon my heart to help me repent and turn to Him. I gained that “Witness” for which the Spirit of God bears upon each child he adopts into God’s family. (and hence why I insist upon calling him “Father”, for truely he is, and that is one of the dearest facts I’ve come to know about Him…)
thank you for some seriously thought-provoking material, it was nice reading through some of your thoughts. May you shine brightly in the service of the Almighty, and may Father bless all your efforts on His behalf, that your words may not fall on deafened ears or hardened hearts.
Amen and Amen.
Wayne Shuman, JulieMillerFan
How and what you wear these ugg boots with is up to your own individual tastes and go with a great many different ugg outfits. For example if wearing jeans then you can either keep them pulled up to uggs full height to show off the detailing or else push ugg rainier boots down. As the slouched ugg rainier are a hot fashion accessory this autumn/winter having a pair of these boots means that you there is no need to go out and purchase a second pair of slouch boots if you don’t want to.